AI SEO Services

Search is being answered rather than listed. A rising share of commercial questions are resolved inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini or an AI Overview, where there is no page two and usually no more than a handful of cited sources. Being one of them is the whole game.

That is what these packages buy. Not a retainer, not a strategy deck: specified placements and entity work, priced on the page, delivered in a stated window, paid in crypto.

Why AI answers name some brands and ignore others

Assistants do not rank pages, they assemble answers. Most of them retrieve a set of documents first, then write from what they retrieved. So the question is not “does my page rank” but “is my page in the retrieved set, and does it say something quotable”.

Three things decide that.

Corroboration across independent sources. A claim that appears on one site is a claim. The same claim on a dozen unrelated sites is a fact, as far as a retrieval system is concerned. This is why AI visibility responds to distribution rather than on-page work alone.

An unambiguous entity. The model has to know what your brand is, what category it sits in, and which other things it relates to. Where that is vague, you get described without being named, or confused with a similarly named company. Where it is well established, you get cited.

Extractable phrasing. Answer engines lift sentences. Text written as a direct, self-contained claim gets quoted; the same information buried in a narrative paragraph gets skipped. This is the cheapest win available and almost nobody does it deliberately.

What actually moves AI visibility

The tactics are less exotic than the category’s marketing suggests.

Citations on sources the models already trust. Placements on established sites that get retrieved regularly. This is the closest thing to a direct lever, and it is what most of the packages here are.

Entity grounding. Getting the brand consistently described, categorised and linked across the places machines read, so the model has a stable idea of what you are.

Press distribution. A single announcement syndicated across many outlets produces the corroboration pattern above at speed, which is why press behaves unusually well here compared to its reputation in classic SEO.

Ordinary link authority underneath it. Retrieval still leans on the search index. A site with no authority does not get retrieved, so it cannot get cited, no matter how quotable its sentences are.

What does not move it: keyword density, schema alone, stuffing your own name into your own copy, or anything that only changes what your own site says about itself.

AI SEO, GEO and AEO are the same job

Three names, one discipline. Generative Engine Optimisation is the term the research community settled on. Answer Engine Optimisation is the same idea framed around answers rather than generation. AI SEO is what most buyers actually type.

The distinctions matter for reading the literature and not much for the work. Anyone selling you GEO as a fundamentally different service from AEO is selling you vocabulary.

Where this differs from an AI SEO agency

Most of the category runs on a retainer: a discovery call, a three to six month minimum, four figures a month, and a report. That model exists partly because the category is new enough that nobody is quite sure what to charge, so everyone charges monthly.

We price the work instead. Each package on this page has a fixed price, a stated deliverable and a delivery window. You buy the one you want, pay in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana or Monero, and send your URLs. There is no call, no contract, no minimum term and no account.

So you can buy AI SEO the way you buy anything else: pick it, pay for it, receive it. Order AI citations as a count of placements. Buy GEO services as a package rather than an engagement you have to remember to cancel. The price you see is the price.

That suits a buyer who already knows what they want placed. It does not suit someone who wants a named strategist on a monthly call, and we would rather say so than sell you the wrong thing.

Measure it before you buy anything

Ask the assistants the questions your buyers would ask, in several phrasings, and write down what comes back: whether you are named, whether you are linked, and who is named instead. That takes an afternoon and gives you a baseline.

Without it you cannot tell whether anything worked, and the category is new enough that plenty of vendors are counting on exactly that.

What we will not claim

We do not sell guaranteed mentions. No one controls what a model says, the outputs vary between runs of the same question, and any vendor promising you a fixed position in an AI answer is describing something they cannot deliver.

What we sell is the input side: citations on retrievable sources, entity grounding, press distribution and the link authority underneath, specified and delivered. Whether that turns into a mention depends on your category, your competitors and how well established they already are.